Skip to content
Best Agentic AppSec logoBest Agentic AppSec

Rankings · Scores 0 to 10 · Weights published

Top 10 Best Agentic AppSec Platforms in 2026 [Ranked & Scored]

AI coding agents now write, install and run code on developer machines. The security question for a CISO is no longer only what lands in the repository, but what the agent can reach while it works: its functionality, its permissions and its autonomy. Too much of any of them is what OWASP's Top 10 for LLM Applications calls excessive agency.

The platforms below take two approaches: govern the agents themselves, and put AppSec agents to work on triage and fixes. The aim is to show agents the right path, not just block the wrong one. We ranked ten platforms on nine published criteria.

Key takeaways

  1. #1

    Legit Security

    8.80 / 10

  2. #2

    Cycode

    7.70 / 10

  3. #3

    Endor Labs

    7.60 / 10

Methodology

Criteria and weights
CriterionWeight
Agent and MCP discovery10%
Agent policy enforcement and audit10%
Secret handling for agents5%
Agentic remediation20%
Agentic triage and prioritization15%
SDLC policy and supply chain posture10%
Scanner coverage and orchestration10%
Named coding agent reach10%
Pricing and trial transparency10%

Scores are editorial and research-based, built from public vendor documentation and review-platform data.

Review-platform ratings are shown as context and are not part of any score.

Full method

How do the top 10 platforms rank?

Agentic AppSec score (editorial assessment, 0 to 10)
#ToolAwardScore
1Legit SecurityBest for endpoint governance of AI coding agents
8.80 / 10
2CycodeBest for AI inventory and IDE guardrails
7.70 / 10
3Endor LabsBest for reachability-based triage
7.60 / 10
4OX SecurityBest for guiding agents before code is written
7.25 / 10
5SnykBest for risk-score prioritization and broad agent reach
7.15 / 10
6GitHub Advanced SecurityBest fix path for repositories on GitHub
6.35 / 10
7ApiiroBest for code-to-runtime risk context
6.30 / 10
8Wiz CodeBest single findings view for teams on Wiz Cloud
6.00 / 10
9SemgrepBest for per-contributor pricing with agent hooks
5.95 / 10
10Backslash SecurityBest for endpoint discovery of agents, MCP servers and skills
4.90 / 10

1. Legit Security

Best for endpoint governance of AI coding agents

8.80 / 10

The Agentic Application Security company: VibeGuard runs as a desktop app on the developer endpoint to discover and govern coding agents, and the ASPM platform prioritizes by business context and remediates with agents.

Why it earns #1

8.80 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on Discovery, Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration and Agent reach; trails on Policy and audit and Pricing.

Standout features

Pros

  • Governs coding agents from a desktop app on the endpoint, with anti-tampering and a central console for the security team.
  • Keeps secrets out of agent sessions through a keychain-backed secrets MCP, and fixes SAST and dependency findings with agents that open pull requests.
  • Highest or tied highest on Discovery

Cons

  • The only published price is an AWS Marketplace bundle; there is no pricing page or free tier.
  • An audit log specific to VibeGuard is not stated on the pages reviewed; Backslash Security scores higher on policy and audit.
  • Pricing and trial transparency: 4 / 10, below GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

The pick for a CISO who wants control of coding agents on every developer machine, backed by an ASPM platform; budget for a sales-led purchase.

Full profileAlternativesVisit Legit Security

2. Cycode

Best for AI inventory and IDE guardrails

7.70 / 10

An AppSec platform whose Maestro orchestration runs an AI Exploitability Agent, an AI Fix and Remediation Agent and a Change Impact Analysis Agent, with IDE guardrails for coding agents.

Why it earns #2

7.70 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on no criterion; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration, Agent reach and Pricing.

Standout features

  • Maestro: Orchestrates the AI Exploitability Agent (reachability), the AI Fix and Remediation Agent (PR-ready fixes) and the Change Impact Analysis Agent.

    Source: Cycode homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Fix agent: Analyzes the root cause of a finding and proposes fixes that match the codebase's frameworks, coding patterns and naming conventions.

    Source: Cycode blog: AI teammates · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • AI security: Detects Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf and Tabnine; the AI-BOM tracks .cursorrules, .windsurfrules, MCP servers and AI API keys with provenance; MCP enforcement.

    Source: Cycode: AI security · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • AI Guardrails: Launched 17 February 2026; Cursor and Claude Code supported at launch.

    Source: Cycode blog: AI Guardrails in the IDE · Read 27 Sep 2026

Pros

  • Three named agents cover exploitability, fixes and change impact under one orchestration layer.
  • Guardrails that intercept prompts, file context and tool calls, plus an AI-BOM with commit provenance.
  • Agentic triage and prioritization: 9 / 10

Cons

  • No price figures published; pricing depends on developer count and AI usage.
  • Validation of fixes is not stated on the pages reviewed.
  • Pricing and trial transparency: 3 / 10, below GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

A close second for teams that want AI inventory, IDE guardrails and three named AppSec agents in one platform.

Full profileAlternatives

3. Endor Labs

Best for reachability-based triage

7.60 / 10

A reachability-based AppSec platform with AURI for coding agent inventory and policy, and AI SAST that traces dataflow across repositories.

Why it earns #3

7.60 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on Triage; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Remediation, SDLC policy, Orchestration, Agent reach and Pricing.

Standout features

  • AURI: Inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills, with policy at the moment of action.

    Source: Endor Labs homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • MCP server: Installs into Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with GitHub Copilot, Codex and Antigravity via npx endorctl ai-tools mcp-server.

    Source: Endor Labs homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Threat Center: Launched 9 September 2026: tracks malicious packages across ecosystems such as npm and PyPI and maps impact to a customer's projects; Package Firewall now checks VS Code extension updates.

    Source: Endor Labs: Threat Center and Package Firewall for VS Code extensions · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Plans: Developer (free, no account, local only), Core and Pro; seats are contributors with commits in the last 90 days.

    Source: Endor Labs pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Pros

  • Reachability across dependencies, containers and first-party code is the core of the product.
  • An agent inventory with policy at the moment of action, and open-source remediation agents that open PRs behind approval gates.
  • Highest or tied highest on Triage

Cons

  • Core and Pro prices are not published.
  • Import of other scanners' findings is not stated; the SBOM Hub imports external SBOMs.
  • Pricing and trial transparency: 4 / 10, below GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

The choice when reachability and fewer false findings matter most, now with open-source fix agents.

Full profileAlternatives

4. OX Security

Best for guiding agents before code is written

7.25 / 10

An AppSec platform whose OX VibeSec sends security guidance to coding agents before they generate code, alongside OX Code, OX Cloud and OX Agentic Pentester.

Why it earns #4

7.25 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on no criterion; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration, Agent reach and Pricing.

Standout features

  • VibeSec: Embeds security context into the AI coding workflow; supports Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro and VS Code with Copilot; analyzes the prompt and sends guidance to the agent before code is generated.

    Source: OX Security docs: VibeSec · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • VibeSec features: Malicious dependency blocking, secret protection, AI inventory and agent activity log; IDE extension (VS Code) and plugin (JetBrains); MCP integration.

    Source: OX Security docs index · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Dependency Vetting: Announced 9 September 2026: inspects each package install an AI agent attempts, blocks known-malicious packages and can apply cool-down periods to newly published packages.

    Source: OX Security blog: VibeSec Dependency Vetting · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • OX Cloud: Launched 16 September 2026: cloud security coverage with AI Detection and Response and Agentic Attack Surface Management for agents in production.

    Source: OX Security blog: OX Cloud for AI agents · Read 27 Sep 2026

Pros

  • Acts before code exists, by sending security guidance to the agent based on the prompt.
  • Dependency vetting at the moment an agent installs a package, with cool-down periods for new versions.
  • Agentic triage and prioritization: 8 / 10

Cons

  • Validation of AI fixes is not stated on the pages reviewed.
  • Prices on its own site are not published; the published list price is an AWS Marketplace bundle.
  • Agentic remediation: 6 / 10, below Legit Security and GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

Strong for teams that want to steer agents before they write code, with a small free tier.

Full profileAlternatives

5. Snyk

Best for risk-score prioritization and broad agent reach

7.15 / 10

A developer security platform with Evo Agentic Development Security for coding agents and a remediation agent in public preview.

Why it earns #5

7.15 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on Agent reach; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration and Pricing.

Standout features

  • Agentic Development Security: Names Claude, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, Antigravity, Kiro and Qodo; discovers MCP servers, skills and tools; evaluates, steers or blocks risky activity; secures code at inception inside agents.

    Source: Snyk Evo Agentic Development Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Launch: Added to Evo on 23 June 2026 to govern AI agents across the development lifecycle; general availability set for 29 June 2026.

    Source: Snyk news: Evo Agentic Development Security launch · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • August 2026 release: Evo Continuous Offensive Security generally available; Snyk Secrets generally available; remediation agent in public preview through the CLI.

    Source: Snyk news: Evo Continuous Offensive Security and Snyk Secrets · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Platform: AI Security Platform with Evo, Agentic Development Security, AI-SPM and DeepCode AI; integrates with Claude Code, Cursor and Codex.

    Source: Snyk homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Snyk Studio brings Snyk into AI tools through an MCP server and shows Cursor, Claude, Windsurf and Copilot as supported tools. Snyk's rate card prices Evo ADS coding agent security at 1.0 credit per active machine per day, with 1 credit = $1 on Enterprise.

Source: Snyk Studio · Read 11 Oct 2026

Source: Snyk plans (October 2026) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Pros

  • Names more of the six tracked coding agents than any other vendor here.
  • Published Free and Team prices and a public Enterprise credit rate.
  • Highest or tied highest on Agent reach

Cons

  • Coding agent security requires an Enterprise subscription.
  • The remediation agent is in public preview.
  • Agentic remediation: 5 / 10, below Legit Security and GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

The broadest named agent support and a self-serve start; agent security needs Enterprise.

Full profileAlternatives

6. GitHub Advanced Security

Best fix path for repositories on GitHub

6.35 / 10

GitHub Secret Protection and GitHub Code Security for repositories on GitHub, with Copilot Autofix and agentic autofix.

Why it earns #6

6.35 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on Remediation and Pricing; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration and Agent reach.

Standout features

Pros

  • A fully described fix path: a branch, stated validation and a pull request, with fix patterns reused through Copilot Memory.
  • Published per-committer prices.
  • Highest or tied highest on Remediation

Cons

  • Agent controls cover GitHub's own Copilot coding agent, not third-party agents.
  • Works on repositories on GitHub Team and Enterprise Cloud only.
  • Agent and MCP discovery: 2 / 10, below Legit Security and Backslash Security at 10

Bottom line

Enough for GitHub-only teams on Copilot; look further once a second agent appears.

Full profileAlternatives

7. Apiiro

Best for code-to-runtime risk context

6.30 / 10

An application risk platform built on a Software Architecture Graph and Risk Graph, with Guardian Agent for AI coding assistants.

Why it earns #7

6.30 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on Triage; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Remediation, SDLC policy, Orchestration, Agent reach and Pricing.

Standout features

  • Platform: AI SAST, AI SCA and AI-SPM; secure prompt enrichment, pre-commit prevention and AI threat modeling; Software Architecture Graph and Risk Graph; Deep Code Analysis; AutoFix; software supply chain security and AI-BOM; 100+ tool integrations.

    Source: Apiiro homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • MCP server: Requires an Apiiro account with API access; documented clients are Cursor and Gemini CLI.

    Source: Apiiro MCP server on GitHub · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Apiiro CLI: Brings the platform to the terminal and to AI coding assistants, naming Claude Code, Cursor and Copilot.

    Source: Apiiro blog: introducing Apiiro CLI · Read 11 Oct 2026

Pros

  • Ties code changes to runtime and architecture context, the deepest triage context in this set alongside Endor Labs' reachability.
  • Guardian Agent works inside Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Claude Code.
  • Highest or tied highest on Triage

Cons

  • No pricing published.
  • AutoFix details (scope, where fixes land, validation) are not stated on the pages reviewed.
  • Pricing and trial transparency: 2 / 10, below GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

Best when the question is which code change matters at runtime.

Full profileAlternatives

8. Wiz Code

Best single findings view for teams on Wiz Cloud

6.00 / 10

Wiz's code security product, sold as an add-on to Wiz Cloud, that ties code findings to the Wiz Security Graph and reaches into AI coding tools through plugins, skills and MCP.

Why it earns #8

6.00 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on no criterion; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration, Agent reach and Pricing.

Standout features

  • Agent plugins: Wiz Code plugins for Claude Code and Cursor.

    Source: Wiz blog: Wiz Code Week recap · Read 11 Oct 2026

  • AI-BOM: Inventories AI frameworks, models and IDE extensions, including Gemini Code Assist, GitHub Copilot and Cursor.

    Source: Wiz blog: Wiz Code Week recap · Read 11 Oct 2026

  • Findings in one view: Aggregates findings from built-in and third-party scanners (SAST, SCA, DAST).

    Source: Wiz Code product page · Read 11 Oct 2026

  • OWASP mapping: SAST rules are mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM and for Agentic Applications.

    Source: Wiz blog: Wiz Code Week recap · Read 11 Oct 2026

Wiz Code fixes issues in the IDE, pull requests or CI/CD and maps SAST rules to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM and for Agentic Applications. Wiz's partner MCP endpoint, generally available on 22 September 2026, lets Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot or any agent that supports remote MCP servers connect to Wiz. AWS Marketplace sells Wiz Code as an add-on to Wiz Cloud.

Source: Wiz blog: Wiz Code Week recap · Read 11 Oct 2026

Source: Wiz blog: Wiz MCP agent integrations · Read 11 Oct 2026

Source: AWS Marketplace: Wiz Code listing · Read 11 Oct 2026

Pros

  • Aggregates findings from built-in and third-party scanners in one view, tied to the Security Graph.
  • Brings fixes into AI coding tools through plugins, Wiz Skills and MCP.
  • Scanner coverage and orchestration: 9 / 10

Cons

  • Agent policy, blocking of agent actions and an endpoint agent are not stated.
  • Sold on AWS Marketplace as an add-on to Wiz Cloud; no public price on wiz.io.
  • Pricing and trial transparency: 3 / 10, below GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

A natural add-on for Wiz Cloud customers who want code findings in the same graph; thinner on agent governance.

Full profileAlternatives

9. Semgrep

Best for per-contributor pricing with agent hooks

5.95 / 10

A code scanning platform with Semgrep Guardian for coding agents, Semgrep Assistant for triage and published Teams pricing.

Why it earns #9

5.95 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on no criterion; trails on Discovery, Policy and audit, Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration, Agent reach and Pricing.

Standout features

  • Guardian: A plugin for AI coding agents that blocks malicious dependencies, hardcoded credentials and vulnerable patterns through an MCP server, hooks on every file write and skills; in the Claude Code and Cursor marketplaces and in Windsurf.

    Source: Semgrep Guardian · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Agentic workflows: Nine workflows in public beta from 28 July 2026 combine program analysis with AI reasoning, covering 70+ CWEs including SQL injection, XSS, SSRF and command injection.

    Source: Semgrep blog: agentic workflows · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Supply chain update: 24 September 2026: AI-assisted malicious package detection, enterprise policies that trigger Jira tickets and Slack alerts, and a Malware Firewall in private beta.

    Source: Semgrep blog: malware detection and response automation · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Platform: Semgrep Multimodal, Assistant auto-triage, remediation guidance in PRs and IDEs, VS Code and JetBrains, MCP.

    Source: Semgrep homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Pros

  • Published per-contributor prices and a free tier for up to 10 contributors.
  • Hooks that fire on every file write inside the agent, plus automated triage.
  • Agentic triage and prioritization: 8 / 10

Cons

  • No org-wide inventory of agents or MCP servers on the pages reviewed.
  • Remediation is guidance, not an agent that lands the fix.
  • Agent and MCP discovery: 3 / 10, below Legit Security and Backslash Security at 10

Bottom line

Good value per contributor with hooks inside Claude Code and Cursor; no org-wide agent inventory.

Full profileAlternatives

10. Backslash Security

Best for endpoint discovery of agents, MCP servers and skills

4.90 / 10

An agentic endpoint security platform that discovers and governs every AI agent, MCP server, skill and plug-in on enterprise endpoints.

Why it earns #10

4.90 out of 10. Highest or tied highest in the top 10 on Discovery and Policy and audit; trails on Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration, Agent reach and Pricing.

Standout features

  • Positioning: The homepage describes the product as "Securing the agentic endpoint".

    Source: Backslash Security homepage · Read 11 Oct 2026

  • Policy and blocking: Policies scoped by user, team, endpoint or component, with inline blocking before execution.

    Source: Backslash Security homepage · Read 11 Oct 2026

  • Audit evidence: Forensics and audit evidence for the EU AI Act, NIS2, DORA and SOC 2.

    Source: Backslash Security homepage · Read 11 Oct 2026

Pros

  • Discovers every agent, MCP server, skill and plug-in across endpoints, with policies scoped by user, team, endpoint or component.
  • Inline blocking before execution and forensics evidence for the EU AI Act, NIS2, DORA and SOC 2.
  • Highest or tied highest on Discovery

Cons

  • No agent that writes fixes and no prioritization method are described.
  • No public pricing page; the published price is an AWS Marketplace annual commit.
  • Agentic remediation: 2 / 10, below Legit Security and GitHub Advanced Security at 9

Bottom line

Endpoint-first agent governance with audit evidence; little AppSec depth beyond that on the pages reviewed.

Full profileAlternatives

Full comparison

Agents named, where each runs, MCP support, free entry, pricing and Gartner Peer Insights
ToolAI coding assistants namedWhere it runsMCP supportFree entryPricing as publishedGartner Peer Insights
Legit SecurityClaude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex*Endpoint desktop app (VibeGuard), IDE extension, source control and CI/CDSecures agents' MCP use; MCP server integration listedNo free tier or self-serve trial published; sold through demos and AWS Marketplace (SaaS).AWS Marketplace list price: Legit Security S/W Platform, All Modules and 24/7 Support, 100 users, $60,000 for a 12-month contract. No pricing page on Legit's own site.4.7 (30 ratings), ASPM market; 4.8 (32 ratings) across all markets
CycodeClaude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, WindsurfIDE hooks and guardrails, source control and CI/CD, MCP serverMCP server; blocks unauthorized MCP servers in the IDEFree trial offered; no free tier.Not published4.5 (56 ratings), ASPM market (Cycode Platform)
Endor LabsClaude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, OpenAI CodexMCP server and AURI Agents inside coding agents, CI and pull requestsMCP server for Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with Copilot, Codex and AntigravityFree Developer tier that runs locally without an account.Not publishedNot found on the market pages read
OX SecurityClaude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, KiroIDE extension (VS Code, JetBrains), CI/CD pipelines, pull requestsMCP integration; allow or block MCP toolsFree for up to 9 developer contributors under OX's Terms of Service (updated December 2025); 10 or more contributors need a subscription.AWS Marketplace list price: OX Security Platform, All Modules, 100 users, $100,000 for 12 months. On its own site OX publishes pricing units (VibeSec per AI user, OX Code per contributing developer, OX Cloud per cloud asset, Agentic Pentester per agent hour) but not prices.4.7 (18 ratings), ASPM market (OX Security Platform)
SnykClaude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex, KiroIDE, CLI, source control, Snyk StudioSnyk Studio MCP server; Evo discovers MCP serversFree plan with IDE, CLI and source control integrations.Free $0 (SCA, SAST, IaC and container, IDE, CLI and SCM integrations). Team $25 a month. Enterprise credit based, 1 credit = $1; the rate card prices Evo ADS coding agent security at 1.0 credit per active machine per day.4.3 (135 ratings), application security testing market (Snyk Code)
GitHub Advanced SecurityGitHub CopilotPull requests and code scanning on GitHubNot described on the pages reviewedNo free tier for private repositories on the pages reviewed; the Copilot coding agent's built-in security checks need no GHAS license.GitHub Secret Protection $19 per active committer per month; GitHub Code Security $30 per active committer per month. Available to GitHub Team and Enterprise Cloud.4.6 (130 ratings), application security testing market (GitHub)
ApiiroClaude Code, Cursor, GitHub CopilotCLI for terminals and AI coding assistants, MCP server, pull requestsMCP server (needs an Apiiro account with API access)No free commercial tier published.Not published4.6 (17 ratings), ASPM market
Wiz CodeClaude Code, Cursor, GitHub CopilotIDE, pre-commit hooks, pull requests, CI/CD, plugins for Claude Code and CursorMCP Server feature on Wiz Code; Wiz partner MCP endpoint generally available 22 Sep 2026No free tier stated on the pages reviewed.AWS Marketplace list price: 100 Wiz Code licenses, add-on for Wiz Cloud, $58,500 for 12 months. No public price on wiz.io.4.5 (46 ratings), ASPM market, listed as Wiz CNAPP (not Wiz Code separately)
SemgrepClaude Code, Cursor, WindsurfInside agents (Guardian hooks), IDE, pull requestsGuardian runs as an MCP serverFree for up to 10 contributors.Free for up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories (60 AI credits). Teams: $30 a month per contributor for Code or Supply Chain, $15 for Secrets, with 20 AI credits per developer a month. Enterprise custom (50 AI credits per developer a month). Guardian pricing is not stated.Not found on the market pages read
Backslash SecurityCursor, GitHub Copilot, WindsurfEnterprise endpoints, IDEs, CLIs, MCP proxyMCP proxy, MCP security and an MCP Server Security HubA free, read-only AI endpoint exposure assessment is offered; no free product tier is stated.AWS Marketplace list price: Backslash Vibe Coding Security Platform, annual commit, $75,000 for 12 months. No public pricing page.Not found on the market pages read

* Codex: supported, per Legit (confirmed to the publisher in October 2026).

Gartner Peer Insights figures were read on 11 October 2026 and are context only, not part of any score.

How does each platform score on each criterion?

Criterion scores, 0 to 10, in rank order. Square marks: highest and lowest in set.
PlatformDiscovery 10%Policy and audit 10%Secrets 5%Remediation 20%Triage 15%SDLC policy 10%Orchestration 10%Agent reach 10%Pricing 10%Total
Legit Security10 highest in set810 highest in set9 highest in set10 highest in set10 highest in set10 highest in set8 highest in set48.80
Cycode9897999737.70
Endor Labs976810 highest in set87747.60
OX Security8876888767.25
Snyk87859778 highest in set77.15
GitHub Advanced Security2 lowest in set4 lowest in set79 highest in set6882 lowest in set9 highest in set6.35
Apiiro756510 highest in set8852 lowest in set6.30
Wiz Code74 lowest in set66689536.00
Semgrep3674877585.95
Backslash Security10 highest in set9 highest in set5 lowest in set2 lowest in set3 lowest in set5 lowest in set5 lowest in set544.90

Which coding agents does each vendor name?

Our coding agent census records which of six coding agents each vendor names as supported on its own public pages. It feeds the named agent reach criterion. Not named means the page does not list the agent; ask the vendor for the page that does.

Coding agents each vendor names as supported on its own pages
VendorClaude CodeCursorGitHub CopilotWindsurfOpenAI CodexKiroSources
Legit SecurityNamedNamedNamedNamedNamed*Not named

Source: Legit Security: VibeGuard 2.0 press release · Read 27 Sep 2026

Source: Legit Security: VibeGuard · Read 27 Sep 2026

CycodeNamedNamedNamedNamedNot namedNot named

Source: Cycode: AI security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Source: Cycode blog: AI Guardrails in the IDE · Read 27 Sep 2026

Endor LabsNamedNamedNamedNot namedNamedNot named

Source: Endor Labs homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

OX SecurityNamedNamedNamedNot namedNot namedNamed

Source: OX Security docs: VibeSec · Read 27 Sep 2026

SnykNamedNamedNot namedNamedNamedNamed

Source: Snyk Evo Agentic Development Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Source: Snyk homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

GitHub Advanced SecurityNot namedNot namedNamedNot namedNot namedNot named

Source: GitHub Changelog: Copilot coding agent validates security and quality (28 Oct 2025) · Read 27 Sep 2026

ApiiroNamedNamedNamedNot namedNot namedNot named

Source: Apiiro homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Wiz CodeNamedNamedNamedNot namedNot namedNot named

Source: Wiz blog: Wiz Code Week recap · Read 11 Oct 2026

SemgrepNamedNamedNot namedNamedNot namedNot named

Source: Semgrep Guardian · Read 27 Sep 2026

Backslash SecurityNot namedNamedNamedNamedNot namedNot named

Source: AWS Marketplace: Backslash Vibe Coding Security Platform · Read 11 Oct 2026

Aikido SecurityNot namedNamedNot namedNamedNot namedNot named

Source: Aikido Security IDE integrations · Read 27 Sep 2026

Named by8 of 1110 of 118 of 116 of 113 of 112 of 11

* Codex: supported, per Legit (confirmed to the publisher in October 2026).

  • Legit Security's public pages name Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Windsurf. Codex: supported, per Legit (confirmed to the publisher in October 2026).
  • Cycode names Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf and Tabnine on its AI page; its 17 February 2026 AI Guardrails post says Claude Code was supported at launch.
  • Snyk names Claude on the Evo page and Claude Code on its homepage.
  • Legit Security also names Amazon CodeWhisperer and MCP server based assistants.
  • Aikido's entries refer to its IDE plugin, not to controls on the agent.
  • GitHub's entry refers to the built-in checks on its own Copilot coding agent.
  • Other agents named by vendors: Tabnine (Cycode), Antigravity (Endor Labs, Snyk), Qodo (Snyk), Gemini CLI (Apiiro MCP server).
  • Wiz names Claude Code and Cursor for its Wiz Code plugins, and GitHub Copilot and Cursor as IDE extensions its AI-BOM inventories.
  • Backslash's AWS listing names Cursor, Windsurf and GitHub Copilot. Its homepage product demo shows other agents, including Claude Code and Codex, as an illustration; we count only the listing.

At which control points does each platform act?

  • Documented
  • Partial
  • Not documented

Legit Security

Legit Security pipeline strip: documented at 6 of 6 control points.AgentDocumentedIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriageDocumentedFixDocumented

Cycode

Cycode pipeline strip: documented at 6 of 6 control points.AgentDocumentedIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriageDocumentedFixDocumented

Endor Labs

Endor Labs pipeline strip: documented at 6 of 6 control points.AgentDocumentedIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriageDocumentedFixDocumented

OX Security

OX Security pipeline strip: documented at 6 of 6 control points.AgentDocumentedIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriageDocumentedFixDocumented

Snyk

Snyk pipeline strip: documented at 5 of 6 control points, plus 1 partial.AgentDocumentedIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriageDocumentedFixPartial

GitHub Advanced Security

GitHub Advanced Security pipeline strip: documented at 3 of 6 control points, plus 2 partial.AgentPartialIDENot documentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriagePartialFixDocumented

Apiiro

Apiiro pipeline strip: documented at 5 of 6 control points, plus 1 partial.AgentDocumentedIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriageDocumentedFixPartial

Wiz Code

Wiz Code pipeline strip: documented at 4 of 6 control points, plus 2 partial.AgentPartialIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriagePartialFixDocumented

Semgrep

Semgrep pipeline strip: documented at 4 of 6 control points, plus 2 partial.AgentPartialIDEDocumentedPull requestDocumentedPipelineDocumentedTriageDocumentedFixPartial

Backslash Security

Backslash Security pipeline strip: documented at 2 of 6 control points, plus 1 partial.AgentDocumentedIDEDocumentedPull requestNot documentedPipelinePartialTriageNot documentedFixNot documented

A filled node means the vendor's own pages describe a control at that point. It does not measure how well the control works.

Control points by vendor documentation status
Control pointDocumented byPartial
Agent7 of 11: Legit Security, Cycode, Endor Labs, OX Security, Snyk, Apiiro, Backslash Security3 of 11: GitHub Advanced Security, Wiz Code, Semgrep
IDE10 of 11: Legit Security, Cycode, Endor Labs, OX Security, Snyk, Apiiro, Wiz Code, Semgrep, Backslash Security, Aikido Security0 of 11
Pull request10 of 11: Legit Security, Cycode, Endor Labs, OX Security, Snyk, GitHub Advanced Security, Apiiro, Wiz Code, Semgrep, Aikido Security0 of 11
Pipeline10 of 11: Legit Security, Cycode, Endor Labs, OX Security, Snyk, GitHub Advanced Security, Apiiro, Wiz Code, Semgrep, Aikido Security1 of 11: Backslash Security
Triage8 of 11: Legit Security, Cycode, Endor Labs, OX Security, Snyk, Apiiro, Semgrep, Aikido Security2 of 11: GitHub Advanced Security, Wiz Code
Fix7 of 11: Legit Security, Cycode, Endor Labs, OX Security, GitHub Advanced Security, Wiz Code, Aikido Security3 of 11: Snyk, Apiiro, Semgrep

Which head-to-head comparisons are available?

Also reviewed

Also reviewed: scored on the same criteria but outside the top 10.

  • Aikido Security

    Best flat published prices

    5.75 / 10

    Simple flat pricing for small teams; not built to govern coding agents.

How to choose

  • If you need control of agents on every developer machine, look at the governance criteria first: discovery, policy and audit, and secrets.
  • If your backlog is the problem, weight triage and remediation.
  • If you are all-in on one ecosystem, check the native option first: GitHub Advanced Security for GitHub, Wiz Code for Wiz Cloud.
  • Ask every vendor for a public page on what its agent controls block, and what happens when a developer turns them off.

Frequently asked questions

Why does a platform without a public pricing page rank first?

Pricing and trial transparency is 10% of the score. The top-ranked platform's only published price is an AWS Marketplace bundle and it has no free tier, so it scores 4 there. It ranks first because of agent governance, triage, SDLC policy and orchestration. If price visibility matters more to you, raise its weight in the agent risk calculator.

Why is agentic remediation weighted at 20%?

Because a fix agent changes what an AppSec team spends its time on. We score what the agent fixes, where the fix lands, whether the vendor says it is validated, and whether it is generally available or in preview.

How often are the scores updated?

When a vendor publishes a change that affects a criterion. This edition uses pages read in September 2026 and updated on 11 October 2026.

Verdict

Legit Security ranks first at 8.80, highest or tied highest on Discovery, Secrets, Remediation, Triage, SDLC policy, Orchestration and Agent reach. Cycode and Endor Labs follow. Legit Security trails on Policy and audit and Pricing, so buyers who weight those criteria should compare the head-to-head pages.

By The Pipeline Desk · Reviewed by the Pipeline Desk editors · Last updated 2026-10-11

Read next